Legal Opinion
Motion Control Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 5, 1992No. 326 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELLEGRINI, Judge.
Motion Control Industries (Employer) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which reversed the Referee’s decision and awarded fatal claim benefits to Tina M. Buck (Claimant) for the work-related death of her husband, Paul M. Buck (decedent).
Decedent had been employed by Motion Control Industries as a foreman and regularly worked the 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. shift. On August 20,1987, the date of his death, decedent had completed his regular shift, had punched out on the time clock, and had started walking to his car which was parked in the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Newhouse v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Schofield v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- D'Agata National Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Lehigh Valley Coal Sales Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ortiz Pérez v. Fondo del Seguro del EstadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- Clark v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Albright v. FaganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Krasevic v. Goodwill Industries of Central Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.