Legal Opinion

Bieger v. Consolidation Coal Co.

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided January 20, 1987No. Civ. A. 84-0188-APublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GLEN M. WILLIAMS, District Judge.

This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment as to Consolidation Coal Company’s third-party complaint.

The underlying facts are as follows. Consolidation Coal Company (“Consol”) was developing a mine in southwestern Virginia and had contracted with Cowin and Company (“Cowin”) to construct a ventilation shaft for the above-mentioned mine. Their contract provided that Cowin would indemnify Consol for any claims against Consol arising from Cowin’s work. The contract states in pertinent part:

[A]nd Contractor [Cowin] ...…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  2. Jennings v. Franz Torwegge MacHine WorksDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1972
  3. Bell v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1972
  4. Burnette v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire v. J.M. Tull MetalsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Bet Plant Services, Inc. v. W.D. Robinson Electric Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1996
  3. Safeway, Inc. v. DPI Midatlantic, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  4. Virginia Polytechnic & State University v. FryeCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  5. Slater v. Skyhawk Transportation, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API