Legal Opinion

Marble Savings Bank v. Williams

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1901No. 3547PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pacific County. — Hon. Henry S. Elliott, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, C. J.

In August, 1892, School District Ho. 4 of Pacific county, in consideration of the sum of $5,137.50, paid to it by Farson, Leach & Co., issued to said company its negotiable bonds in the sum of $5,000, payable twenty years after August 1, 1892, bearing interest at the rate of seVen per cent, per annum, payable semi-annually. Interest installments were evidenced by interest coupons attached to each bond. Said bonds were issued for the purpose of purchasing a school house site and erecting and furnishing a school house for said district. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Washington, Alexandria, & Georgetown Steam-Packet Co. v. SicklesSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  4. Fahey v. Esterley Machine Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Hooker v. HubbardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ætna Life Insurance v. Board of Com'rsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Lilly-Brackett Co. v. SonnemannWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Dalton Adding MacHine Sales Co. v. LindquistWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Diamond Ice & Storage Co. v. Klock Produce Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Dunsmuir v. Port Angeles Gas, Water, Electric Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API