Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. DeLoach
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of James B. DeLoach, the plaintiff below, damage? being assessed at $2,250.
The complaint was based upon a surety undertaking entered into by the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, as surety, and the Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Company, as principal, by which Fry, as prinr cipal “guarantees under the conditions herein contained” that during the guaranty period it will make at its own expense any. repairs of damage caused by ordinary wear and tear by the elements on a roof installed on a building owned by DeLoch.
The surety…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jones v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Carter v. FranklinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Clinton Mining Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Ten Ball Novelty & Manufacturing Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Floyd v. PughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gertz v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Bank of Brewton, Inc. v. INTERN. FIDELITY INS. COMPANYSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Cobbs v. Fred Burgos Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Mortgage Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1979
- Central Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.