Legal Opinion

Maulding v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 11, 1989No. CR 87-54PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

In the motion before us petitioner Harless Dale Maulding asks this court to allow him to file a forty-page petition pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 37. This court adopted a ten-page limitation on such petitions on June 5, 1989. Petitioner argues that it is a denial of due process of law to limit him to a ten-page petition when no such limitation existed at the time he was convicted of rape, kidnapping and burglary in 1986. We conclude that this court may place reasonable limitations on the form of pleadings before it and deny the motion.

States are not obligated to provide for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Pickens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Whitmore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. State v. Tejeda-AcostaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Watkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API