Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 22, 2015No. CR-14-716PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

|, On November 14, 2013, judgment was entered reflecting that appellant Olajuwon Smith had entered pleas of guilty to multiple felony offenses. On January 21, 2014, appellant filed in the trial court a timely, verified pro se petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2013). The petition was dismissed on January 23, 2014, on the ground that it did not comply with Rule 37.1(b), which sets out certain requirements for the form of a petition under the Rule. On January 31, 2014, appellant filed a second petition under Rule 37.1, which the court denied…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Trevino v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Watkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Maulding v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  2. Randle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Smith v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Felty v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  5. Granville Murphy v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API