Legal Opinion

Paa Management, Ltd. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 27, 1992No. 982, Docket 91-6275PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MINER, Circuit Judge:

Respondent-appellant United States of America appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Knapp, J). The order quashed administrative summonses, issued by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) pursuant to section 7602 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 26 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. (“I.R.C.” or “Code”), to petitioner-appellee PAA Management, Ltd. (“PAAM”), and to Arthur Andersen & Co., Spear, Leeds & Kellogg, Wagner Stott Clearing Corp., and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith. PAAM is the general partner, and “tax matters…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. City of Milwaukee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. BiscegliaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Sugarloaf Funding, LLC v. U.S. Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. Mollison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Martinez (In Re Martinez)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. Carroll v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API