Mollison v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
Petitioners-Appellants, who consist of members of the Vento family and their associated entities, seek to quash a third-party summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) to Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. as part of an investigation into potential tax liabilities arising from the sale of stock worth approximately $180 million. In dismissing the petitions and enforcing the summons, the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Jed S. Rakoff, Judge) concluded, inter alia, that the purpose of the summons was “legitimate” under United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 85 S.Ct. 248,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. BiscegliaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Construction Products Research, Inc. Five Star Products, Inc. And H. Nash BabcockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- In Re McvaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Adamowicz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- United States v. McHenryDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- United States v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008
- Highland Capital Management, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Timothy Elmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.