Sheehan v. San Francisco 49ers, Ltd.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
In 2005, the San Francisco 49ers, Ltd. (49ers), began implementing a policy of the National Football League (NFL) requiring all patrons at their football games to submit to a patdown search before entering the stadium. Plaintiffs claim the policy violates their state constitutional right to privacy. (Cal. Const., art. I, § 1.) The case has come to us after the superior court sustained a demurrer and dismissed the action. On appeal after the superior court has sustained a demurrer, we assume as true all facts alleged in the complaint. (Evans v. City of Berkeley (2006) 38 Cal.4th…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Evans v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- American Academy of Pediatrics v. LungrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
- Apple Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
- Julian v. Mission Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.