Sterling Drug, Inc. v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Wolcott, Justice:
This is an appeal from an order of the Vice-Chancellor denying the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
The action is for an accounting of royalties due the plaintiff. The plaintiff,1 the owner of a patent for a cleansing substance for sensitive skin, granted the defendants an exclusive license of the patent. The license agreement provided for the payment to the plaintiff annually oí 5% of the net receipts of all sales made by defendants of the licensed product, provided, however, that no royalties, with the exception of a minimum annual royalty of $3,000, would be due the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hudson v. Yonkers Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Martin v. American Potash & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Durney v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1951
- duPont v. duPontSupreme Court of Delaware · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cross v. HairSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
- Beard v. ElsterCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
- Alexander Industries, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Haveg Corporation v. GuyerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Hughes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.