Legal Opinion

Cross v. Hair

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 1, 1969PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from the denial of summary judgment in an automobile negligence case. Non-agency was the issue tendered. In denying summary judgment, the Superior Court stated:

“The record reveals disputes as to material questions of fact. For example, the affidavits submitted are in conflict over the question of what control the defendant Lowe had over the driving activities of the defendant Hair.
“I am not holding that the matter of agency raised here is a jury question although after the evidence at trial has ■been submitted it may be decided that it is. It also may be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alexander Industries, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  2. Haveg Corporation v. GuyerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  3. Wilmington Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  4. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ponsell's Drug Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  5. Sterling Drug, Inc. v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Aeroglobal Capital Management, LLC v. Cirrus Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Billops v. Magness Construction Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  4. Empire of America Relocation Services, Inc. v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  5. Pack & Process, Inc. v. Celotex Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1985

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API