Bridgers v. . Bank
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentBrown, J.
On motion his Honor continued the restraining order and enjoined the defendants from putting the agreement hereinafter stated into effect, or taking any action thereunder. It was admitted that the First National Bank of Tarboro was duly organized under the National banking act, and was conducting a general banking business as authorized by law; that plaintiff is a stockholder in the bank; that the defendant Holderness is president, Johnson vice president and Pennington cashier of the bank; that the bank was organized in the fall of 1906, and the above named have been its officers since its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Concord First National Bank v. HawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Shepaug Voting Trust CasesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Morel v. HogeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Harvey v. Linville Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Sheppard v. Rockingham Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People ex rel. Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet & Irrigated Land Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Bankers' Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. SlossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Robinson v. BenbowCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
- Sommers v. Apalachicola Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1918