Legal Opinion
Quentin R. Jones and Melvin McDaniel v. Department of the Navy
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 28, 1992No. 92-3216PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
The petitioners challenge the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board), sustaining their indefinite suspensions without pay from their jobs at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard. The suspensions followed the termination of their access to classified information, and were to continue until the agency determined whether to cancel their security clearances. After the agency had decided not to cancel the clearances, the petitioners were returned to their jobs. They seek back pay for the period of their suspensions.
We uphold the suspensions, on the grounds that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Department of the Navy v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dorfmont v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- John Doe v. Richard B. Cheney, Secretary of Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stehney v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Rayburn F. HESSE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- James B. King, Director, Office of Personnel Management v. Raymond Alston, and Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- George Pararas-Carayannis v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Robinson v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.