Joshua Hendy Machine Works v. Pacific Cable Construction Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeati from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
The complaint in this action is in two counts. In the first it is alleged that the defendant is indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $4,566.55, “the siime being the balance of an account for goods, wares, and merchandise .... sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant, and for work and labor and services performed thereon and in connection therewith, by plaintiff, at defendant’s .... request . . . . ; that the whole amount and aggregate value of the items of said account is the sum of $35,744.35, no part of which has been paid except the sum of $31,177.80, leaving the aforesaid balance of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hill v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Grim v. NorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- White v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Seaman v. MarianiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1850
3Cited by14 opinions
- Electronic Equipment Express, Inc. v. Donald H. Seiler & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Imperial Bank v. Pim Electric, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Rossi v. ZappaterraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Estate of MagerlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Garland v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.