Legal Opinion

Northington v. Alabama Department of Conservation & Natural Resources

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 25, 2009No. 1071429PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOLIN, Justice.

This appeal involves the constitutionality of Act No. 2006-398, Ala. Acts 2006, codified at § 33-6A-3.1, Ala.Code 1975, effective July 1, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), which prohibits certain marine vessels on three impoundment lakes in Alabama — Lake Martin, Weiss Lake, and Lake Harris (also known as Lake Wedow-ee). 1 All three lakes are hydroelectric-impoundment lakes created and owned in whole or in part by Alabama Power Company.

Facts and Procedural History

The Act, which was signed into law by Governor Bob Riley on April 17, 2006, prohibits the following…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Stanley Haves, Marjorie Haves, His Wife v. City of Miami, a Municipal Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  4. Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Allstate Ins. Co. v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blalock v. SutphinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  2. Benson W. Peak v. City of Tuscaloosa.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  3. Duran v. BucknerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  4. Tulley v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
  5. Baldwin County Planning & Zoning Commission v. Montrose Ecor Rouge, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API