Legal Opinion
Shlopak v. Davison
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 11, 1943No. 113PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Associate Judge.
Plaintiff sued for possession of real estate on the ground of non-payment of rent and, as authorized by the Code, Section 16 — 512, and by Municipal Court rules, joined in the complaint a claim for a money judgment in the sum of $1,306.85, for rent in arrears. Defendant admitted owing approximately $187.50. Trial was by jury and resulted in a verdict for possession and in a money judgment for $600. Defendant filed motions for new trial, in arrest of judgment, and for judgment non obstante, all of which were overruled by the trial judge. Two principal points are…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Herencia v. GuzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- District Hauling & Construction Co. v. ArgerakisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Malden Trust Co. v. PerlmuterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- McCurley v. National Savings & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919
- Blair-Parke Coal & Coke Co. v. Fiedler-Davis Fuel Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- District of Columbia v. BarriteauDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Scales v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Imhoff v. WalkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Palmer v. GarvesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Peay v. ParksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.