State v. De Passquallo

*236OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

The issues presented are whether the trial court correctly applied credit for pre-sentence incarceration to appellant’s sentence and whether appellant’s plea of guilty was voluntary. For the following reasons, we find that credit for presentence incarceration was properly applied and that the plea was voluntary.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On August 18, 1981, an indictment was filed in the Maricopa County Superior Court charging appellant with seven counts of fraudulent schemes and artifices and five counts of theft. On September 10, 1981, the United States District Court for the…