Legal Opinion

State v. De Passquallo

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1984No. 6095-PRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

We adopt the statement of facts set forth in the court of appeals opinion, 140 Ariz. 235, 681 P.2d 387 (1983), as follows.

On August 18, 1981, an indictment was filed in the Maricopa County Superior Court charging appellant [petitioner in the supreme court] with seven counts of fraudulent schemes and artifices and five counts of theft. On September 10, 1981, the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota sentenced appellant to a term of one year and one day for making a false bank entry with the intent to defraud. Appellant was sent to the federal correctional…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Cruz-MataArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. De PassqualloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. AlireCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. State v. McClureCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. State of Arizona v. Brandon Albert SeayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API