Matton Steamboat Co. v. Murphy
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
In these cases appellants have sought to appeal under § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (a), from judgments of the New York courts sustaining the validity of the New York Unemployment Insurance Law (N. Y. Labor Law, § 500 et seg.). The applicable section, 28 U. S. C. § 350, provides that “no appeal . . . intended to bring any judgment or decree before the Supreme Court for review shall be allowed or entertained unless application therefor be duly made within three months after the entry of such judgment or decree.”
The question for our decision is whether the appeals…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Spies v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Department of Banking of Neb. v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cardona v. QuinonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. VigilSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
3Cited by67 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- R.E. Rodgers and Barbara Rodgers v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Jose Luis Pena v. Seguros La Comercial, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.