Legal Opinion

Walker v. McCrea

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2000No. 53A04-9905-CV-238PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge

Plaintiff John Walker appeals an order requiring him to pay $1944 in attorney fees to defendants David Rose, Rose & Walker Dry Wall & Insulation, Rose and Walker Siding, Rose and Walker, Inc., Rose and Walker Partnership, Rose and Walker Siding Specialties (hereinafter collectively referred to as Rose and Rose & Walker). The following restated issue is presented in this appeal:

Did the trial court abuse its discretion in awarding attorney fees pursuant to Ind. Trial Rule 37 to Rose and Rose & Walker after it denied Walker’s motion to compel discovery because Walker…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Babinchak v. Town of ChestertonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Hatfield v. Edward J. DeBartolo Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. ReevesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Steele v. McDonald's Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bacompt Systems, Inc. v. AshworthIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Hall v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Popovich v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2014
  4. Popovich v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2016
  5. Michael J. Quinn and Caroline Quinn v. Conifer Insurance Company and City of Kokomo (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API