Legal Opinion

Edison Phonograph Co. v. Kaufmann

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1901No. 8PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

ACHESON, Circuit Judge.

I cannot doubt that the complainants have the right to sell their patented phonographs with the restric- : tions and upon the conditions contained in their “jobber’s agreement,” and that dealers buying the patented instruments- from the - jobbers with notice of those restrictions and conditions are bound - thereby. Dickerson v. Matheson, 6 C. C. A. 466, 57 Fed. 524; Same v. Tinling, 28 C. C. A. 139, 84 Fed. 192, 195. The material facts here appearing are these: Upon application, for a supply of the *961patented phonographs by the defendants to the complainants,, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. TinlingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  2. Dickerson v. MathesonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. John D. Park & Sons Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  2. Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. FairCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
  3. Butterick Publishing Co. v. RoseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Edison Phonograph Co. v. PikeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1902
  5. National Phonograph Co. v. SchlegelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API