People v. Pitt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant’s claim that the stop of his automobile and the search of the interior were violative of his constitutional protec*724tions against unlawful searches and seizures is without merit. Quite aside from his failure at the suppression hearing to establish the requisite standing (see, People v Cofresi, 60 NY2d 728, 730), the actions of the police were well justified by settled decisional law. The radio transmission, alerting the officers that a car fitting the description of the defendant’s vehicle had been involved in a burglary, constituted a sufficient predicate for the stop (People v…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- BROWN BROS. v. Beam Constr.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. BeltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. LandyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. LangenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CobbsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. ReidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. BianchiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. MercadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.