Legal Opinion

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. City & County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1909No. 6011PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Denver County Court — Hon. Charles McCall, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Musser

In 1904 The Singer Manufacturing Company returned a schedule of its property for taxation to the county assessor of the city and county of Denver. That schedule does not appear in the record. In the written objections to the assessment, filed by the company with the assessor, it is said that it appears from a notice sent to the company by the assessor that, in this schedule, the company had made no return under the item “other property not enumerated,” and the assessor had amended the schedule by assessing under this item an amount of $2,500.00; and that, in the schedule under the item,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Catron v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Oregon Coal Co. v. Coos Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Canal & Banking Co. v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Consolidated Coal Co. v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. New Orleans Cotton Exchange v. Board of AssessorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stanton v. State Tax CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. City & County of Denver v. LewinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. HannaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Citizens' Committee for Fair Property Taxation v. WarnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  5. Colorado Tax Commission v. Midland Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API