Legal Opinion

Remington Rand Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 4, 1954No. 49176PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJones, Chief Judge

Plaintiff sues for $126,187.96 which allegedly represents its cost in certain development work on the image orthicon pickup tube, a supersensitive electronic device designed for television cameras in connection with guided missile weapons. Recovery is said to be grounded on either an implied contract within our general jurisdiction1 or section 17 of the Contract Settlement Act of 1944.2

This litigation grew out of a contract between plaintiff and the Army’s Aircraft Radio Laboratory (hereinafter ARL) dated June 13, 1944, and executed July 11, 1944. Under this contract plaintiff agreed to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Klebe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Johnson v. Igleheart Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  4. Klebe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1922
  5. Lacchi Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McNulty v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API