Legal Opinion

H. J. Heinz Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1953No. Appeals, 21 to 24PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The present four appeals by the defendant employer, from the decisions of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review to the effect that the claimants are not barred from unemployment compensation, raise a single question of law. For that reason the appeals will be consolidated for disposition in this opinion.

Claimants were all discharged by their employer, the defendant, on February 1, 1951. On the next day three of them received vacation pay for the following two weeks and the other for one week. These payments related to benefit claim periods and under §4(u) of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fazio v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Yellow Cab Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Muldoon Unemploy. Comp. CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Penflex, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Cassar v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Weimer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Beaunit Mills, Inc. v. Division of Employment SecurityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Santus Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API