Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Giang
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 16, 1988PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
A judge of the Superior Court reported the following question to the Appeals Court: Whether the Commonwealth’s statement of its expected evidence is sufficient to withstand the defendant’s pretrial motion to dismiss the indictments. We transferred the case on our own motion. We conclude that the evidence which the Commonwealth intends to offer at a full trial is sufficient to withstand a motion for a required finding of not guilty. We therefore remand this case for trial.
We summarize the Commonwealth’s statement of expected evidence. Nguon Bun Tea and his wife, MomLy, own, operate, and are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SoaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. CasaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance v. AbernathyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. BiancoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Colon-CruzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. CatalinaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. LaoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. PopeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. MandileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.