Cordova v. World Finance Corp. of NM
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIELS, Justice.
{1} This case requires us to review the validity of a small loan company’s form arbitration provision that would limit a borrower to mandatory arbitration as a forum to settle all disputes whatsoever, while reserving for the lender the exclusive option of access to the courts for all remedies the lender is most likely to pursue against a borrower. We hold that such an inherently one-sided agreement is against New Mexico public policy and is therefore void as unconscionable. Although we differ somewhat in our legal analysis, we affirm the decision of the Court of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- State v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Taylor v. ButlerTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Rivera v. American General Financial Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- State Ex Rel. King v. B&B Investment Group, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
- Strausberg v. Laurel Healthcare Providers, LLCNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- Mosley v. TitusDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Baranco v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.