Legal Opinion

Bernal v. The Boeing Company

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 8, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00533Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 10 11 PAUL BERNAL and JACK COE, CASE NO. 2:22-cv-00533-TL 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO v. DISMISS 13 THE BOEING COMPANY, 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant the Boeing Company’s Rule 12(b)(6) 17 motion to dismiss Plaintiff Paul Bernal’s sole claim of retaliation in violation of the Washington 18 Law Against Discrimination (“WLAD”), RCW 49.60 et seq. Dkt. No. 18. Having reviewed the 19 relevant record and governing law, the Court DENIES the motion. 20 I. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API