Legal Opinion

Young v. 2911 CORP.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 11, 1995No. C3-94-2464PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

District court dismissed dram shop claim because injured tavern patron giving statutory notice was unable to name her assailant. The patron appeals. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

In February 1992, appellant Sholanda Young and some friends went to William’s Pub, owned by respondent 2911 Corporation, d/b/a William’s Uptown Corporation (William’s). A stranger became belligerent when Young declined his invitation to dance. After he returned to his table, she observed that he was drinking beer and what appeared to be “Long Island Iced Tea,” an alcoholic drink. Later, he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Olander v. Sperry and Hutchinson CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Donahue v. West Duluth Lodge No. 1478 of Loyal Order of MooseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. May v. StreckerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Buskey v. Am. Legion PostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. Oslund v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API