Legal Opinion

Fritz-Pontiac-Cadillac-Buick v. Goforth

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 17, 1994No. 23994PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

This a declaratory judgment action. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company (Universal) contends that the trial judge erred in ruling that Larry A. Goforth (Goforth) was an insured under a policy Universal issued to Fritz-Pontiac-Cadillac-Buick’s (Fritz). We agree and reverse.

I. Facts

On October 30, 1989, Fritz allowed Goforth to take a Cadillac Allante for an overnight test drive. While driving home, Goforth lost control of the Cadillac and ran off the road, causing extensive damage to the car. Pursuant to a collision and liability policy, Universal paid Fritz for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sloan Construction Co. v. Central National InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Torrington Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. Wilcox v. Glover Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Western Motor Co. v. KoehnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  5. Eberhardt v. ForresterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. B.L.G. Enterprises, Inc. v. First Financial InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Diamond State Insurance v. Homestead Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Beach Co. v. Twillman, Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Stewart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  5. MGC Management of Charleston, Inc. v. Kinghorn Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API