Fritz-Pontiac-Cadillac-Buick v. Goforth
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Chief Justice:
This a declaratory judgment action. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company (Universal) contends that the trial judge erred in ruling that Larry A. Goforth (Goforth) was an insured under a policy Universal issued to Fritz-Pontiac-Cadillac-Buick’s (Fritz). We agree and reverse.
I. Facts
On October 30, 1989, Fritz allowed Goforth to take a Cadillac Allante for an overnight test drive. While driving home, Goforth lost control of the Cadillac and ran off the road, causing extensive damage to the car. Pursuant to a collision and liability policy, Universal paid Fritz for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sloan Construction Co. v. Central National InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Torrington Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Wilcox v. Glover Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Western Motor Co. v. KoehnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Eberhardt v. ForresterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- B.L.G. Enterprises, Inc. v. First Financial InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Diamond State Insurance v. Homestead Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Beach Co. v. Twillman, Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Stewart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- MGC Management of Charleston, Inc. v. Kinghorn Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.