Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Glover Motors, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1967No. 116PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

The principal contention of the defendants, with reference to the issue of negligence by Anders, was that Anders was faced with a sudden emergency due to the failure of 'the brakes on the Glover car which he was driving. The plaintiffs assign as error portions of the charge to the jury with reference to the doctrine of sudden emergency. We find in these instructions, when read in context, no error prejudicial to the plaintiffs.

In his argument to the jury upon this issue, one of the trial counsel for Anders (not his counsel in this Court) read to the jury excerpts from the published opinions…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wells v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Cashwell v. Fayetteville Pepsi-Cola Bottling WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Harrington v. Commissioners of WadesboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Travis v. DuckworthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Whiteside v. McCarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. AnthonySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. LawsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API