Legal Opinion

Stewart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 30, 2000No. 3178PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Judge:

Anthony and Denise Stewart (Husband and Wife) appeal the order of the Circuit Court granting summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The court found Wife’s alleged injuries were not compensable under a separate “per person” liability limit of the State Farm policy which provided coverage for Husband’s injuries caused by State Farm’s insured. We affirm.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The material facts of this case are not in dispute. Husband was involved in an automobile accident with Steven Middleton. Wife was not a witness to the accident and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bilodeau v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. B.L.G. Enterprises, Inc. v. First Financial InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Graham v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Diamond State Insurance v. Homestead Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Bloom v. RavoiraSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Burroughs v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Schmidt v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Bishop of Charleston v. Century Indemnity Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
  4. Evanston Insurance v. WattsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
  5. Allstate Insurance v. TozerDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API