Legal Opinion

Alaskan Adventure Tours, Inc. v. The City and Borough of Yakutat

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2013No. 6814 S-14483PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal concerns a company's efforts to vacate a fraudulent conveyance judgment. The company sought relief under Alaska Civil Rule 60(b)8), claiming fraud and misconduct on the part of a borough in the course of a fraudulent conveyance trial concerning liability for property taxes. Specifically, the company argued that a police officer falsely testified at trial concerning a conversation he allegedly had with the company president regarding the company's obligation to pay borough taxes. The superior court denied relief under Rule 60(b)@8), finding…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Anne Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  3. Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Prentzel v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Rego v. RegoAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Espeland v. OneWest Bank, FSBAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. PLC, LLC. and MH2, LLC. v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Szabo v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Cox v. Estate of Steve CooperAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Creekside Limited Partnership, Creekside-Alyeska, LLC, and Community Development, Inc. v. Alaska Housing Finance CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API