Legal Opinion

Sommer Corporation v. United Fruit Company, Defendant-Third Party v. Panama Canal Company, Third Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 23, 1973No. 73-1147PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Sommer Corporation sued United Fruit Company to recover damages to cargo shipped aboard United’s vessel, the HAR BOKER. Damage to at least one piece of cargo occurred during loading operations by stevedores and longshoremen in the employ of the Panama Canal Company. United tendered defense of Sommer’s suit to the Canal Company but this offer was rejected. United then impleded the company as third party defendant.

The United States District Court for the Canal Zone ruled that under the Carriage of Goods at Sea Act United’s liability was limited to $500.00, and further held that United was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strachan Shipping Company v. Koninklyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot Maalschappy, N.V.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  2. T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. Skibs A/s HasselCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. Sandoval v. Mitsui SempakuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Noritake Co., Inc. v. M/v Hellenic ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Hamilton v. Canal Barge Company, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API