Spencer v. Spencer
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McQUADE, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order dismissing an action for failure to have brought within the jurisdiction of the court a party whom the district court found was “necessary and essential * * * [to] a full, just and equitable judgment.” M. R. Skel-ton, a defendant, the necessary party, was not served with summons nor did he otherwise appear in this action.
Appellants are the widow and children of S. R. Spencer. Two other Spencer children, Leland and Carmen, at first refused to join as plaintiffs and so were named defendants; now, however, though nominally respondents, they…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Wilkes v. DinsmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Lorang v. HaysIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Union Paving Company v. Downer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tucker v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Shields v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Ramseyer v. RamseyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Thomas Ex Rel. Schmidt v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Skelton v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.