Legal Opinion
Fairfield v. Huntington
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 8, 1922No. Civil No. 2004PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.
The question presented by this appeal is the constitutionality of chapter 169 of the Sessions Laws of the Fifth Arizona Legislature, which became a law on the 23d of March, 1921, and reads as follows:
“An act for the relief of Gordon G. Huntington, injured by an explosion while in the service of the state of Arizona, and making an appropriation therefor.
“Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
“Section 1. That whereas, Gordon G. Huntington, while in the employ of the state engineer of Arizona, sustained personal injuries arising out of, and in the course of, such employment,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Woodall v. DarstWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. Westchester County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Lehigh Valley R.R. Co. v. . Canal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Sandel v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
- Munro v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Mills v. StewartMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- City of Bellevue v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Hickey v. Board of Education of City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.