Legal Opinion

Continental Supply Co. v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1931No. 29,933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an action on a written promise to pay money. Defendant answered setting up that plaintiff made certain oral promises at the time the writing was signed. Plaintiff demurred to the answer of defendant. The demurrer was sustained and judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

Suit was brought on an instrument as follows:

“Whereas, the said party of the first part (E. H. Morgan) has heretofore been adjudged a bankrupt and was at the time of said adjudication indebted to said party of the second part on two promissory notes, and
“Whereas,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hudson State Bank v. HaileSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Long-Bell Lumber Co. v. McCray Band Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Grantham v. Hanenkratt Lead & Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Robinson v. JacobiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Miller v. BussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weiner v. Wilshire Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  2. Arensman v. KitchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  3. Oliver v. NugenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Custom Built Homes Co. v. Kansas State Commission of Revenue & TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Talbott v. NibertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API