Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Hovey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

. Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Negligence case. Defendants bring error. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Plaintiff had his hand injured by coming in contact with'what is called a “peep saw” in defendants’ mill, and brings this action for damages, claiming that his injuries resulted from the negligence of the defendants.

The defendants were operating a steam saw-mill, and among other machinery used therein was a train of live rollers, used in carrying slabs, edgings, timber, and lumber from the main saw to the front of the mill. About the center of this train of rollers was a small circular saw, set laterally across the train of rollers, and used for sawing in ; two the planks, slabs, timber, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lemon v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Howe v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Scarpelli v. Portland Electric Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Ramsey v. Tremont Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  4. Willis v. Besser-Churchill Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Martin v. Jerry Madden Shingle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API