Scarpelli v. Portland Electric Power Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
We shall first consider the assignment of error predicated upon the refusal of the Circuit Court to direct a verdict in favor of the appellant. The facts material to this assignment of error we shall now outline. February 15,1926, at 9:15 p. m. the deceased and ten others were riding in a seven-passenger open model Hudson automobile south on East 12th Street in Portland. One Phillip Partipilo, seventeen years of age, was the driver; in the front seat, beside the latter, were two others. Seated on the rear seat was the deceased, his wife, and one other; on the deceased’s lap was his sixteen…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago Union Traction Co. v. BrowdyIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Marshall v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Orr v. Cedar Rapids & Marion City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Stabenau v. . Atlantic Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Johnson v. HoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Spicer v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway EmployeesOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Towne v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Brown v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Murphy v. ReadOregon Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.