Legal Opinion

Scarpelli v. Portland Electric Power Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

We shall first consider the assignment of error predicated upon the refusal of the Circuit Court to direct a verdict in favor of the appellant. The facts material to this assignment of error we shall now outline. February 15,1926, at 9:15 p. m. the deceased and ten others were riding in a seven-passenger open model Hudson automobile south on East 12th Street in Portland. One Phillip Partipilo, seventeen years of age, was the driver; in the front seat, beside the latter, were two others. Seated on the rear seat was the deceased, his wife, and one other; on the deceased’s lap was his sixteen…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago Union Traction Co. v. BrowdyIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Marshall v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Orr v. Cedar Rapids & Marion City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Stabenau v. . Atlantic Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Johnson v. HoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spicer v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway EmployeesOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Towne v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Brown v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Murphy v. ReadOregon Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API