Legal Opinion

Dimare Fresh, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 28, 2015No. 2015-5006PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACH, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants (“Tomato Producers” or “Appellants”) appeal the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Claims Court”) dismissing their Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). The Claims Court dismissed the Amended Complaint on the ground that press releases issued by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA” or “Government”), which warned consumers of a possible link between Appellants’ tomatoes and an outbreak of Salmonella Saintpaul (“salmonella”), did not effect a regulatory…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Katzin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  2. Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  3. Virgin Islands Port Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  4. Lippmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. State ex rel. AWMS Water Solutions, L.L.C. v. Mertz (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API