Legal Opinion

Lonza, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 25, 1994No. Slip Op. 94-50. Court No. 90-03-00143PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOLDBERG, Judge:

This matter is before the court following trial de novo. Plaintiff, Lonza, Inc. (“Lon-za”), challenges the decision of the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) to classify imports of ADC-6, 1 an acyclic organic compound, as other oxygen-function amino-compounds under subheading 2922.50.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the Unit ed States (“HTS”). 2 Lonza argues that although ADC-6 is described by this subheading, ADC-6 is more properly classified under subheading 2941.90.50, HTS, as other antibiotics. 3 Lonza notes that if its merchandise is classifiable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  2. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  3. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  4. Keve v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  5. United States v. RobinsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lonza, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Amity Leather Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API