Lonza, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Judge:
This matter is before the court following trial de novo. Plaintiff, Lonza, Inc. (“Lon-za”), challenges the decision of the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) to classify imports of ADC-6, 1 an acyclic organic compound, as other oxygen-function amino-compounds under subheading 2922.50.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the Unit ed States (“HTS”). 2 Lonza argues that although ADC-6 is described by this subheading, ADC-6 is more properly classified under subheading 2941.90.50, HTS, as other antibiotics. 3 Lonza notes that if its merchandise is classifiable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Keve v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- United States v. RobinsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lonza, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Amity Leather Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996