Hopewell Township Board of Supervisors v. Golla
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
Hopewell Township, in York County, has appealed from the Court of Common Pleas of York County, which held certain agricultural zone provisions of the Hopewell Township Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance) to be unconstitutional.,..
*575In 1968, Edward B. G-olla and Elizabeth M. Golla, husband and wife, purchased a 140-acre farm in Hopewell Township. On December 29, 1976, they conveyed a ten percent interest in their farm, “undivided but divisible on demand”, to each of their three sons, with the understanding that the land would be permanently partitioned when a survey of the land…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Surrick v. ZHB OF U. PROVIDENCE TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hopewell Township Board of Supervisors v. GollaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Sultanik v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Golla v. Hopewell Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Christ United Methodist Church v. Municipality of Bethel ParkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Boundary Drive Associates v. Shrewsbury Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.