Legal Opinion
Boundary Drive Associates v. Shrewsbury Township Board of Supervisors
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 9, 1984No. Appeals, Nos. 1229 C.D. 1983 and 1281 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
Boundary Drive Associates appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of York County, which affirmed a decision of the Shrewsbury Town*9ship Zoning Hearing Board denying Boundary a variance and rejecting its challenge to the validity of portions of the township’s zoning ordinance. The issues for our review are whether the board erred in denying the “validity variance” or in rejecting the challenge to the validity of the agricultural zoning provisions of the ordinance, and whether the ordinance section governing fees is valid.
In 1975, when the township had no zoning…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Surrick v. ZHB OF U. PROVIDENCE TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Hopewell Township Board of Supervisors v. GollaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- A & D, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Boundary Drive Associates v. Shrewsbury Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Shohola Falls Trails End Property Owners Ass'n v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Laurel Point Associates v. Susquehanna Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Codorus Township v. RodgersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Boundary Drive Associates v. Shrewsbury Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.