Legal Opinion

United States v. Meinster

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided April 29, 1980No. 79-165-CR-JLKPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL BASED ON NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE

JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge.

This matter arose upon the motion of defendant Meinster for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The newly discovered evidence asserted by the defendant is stated in the following conclusory fashion: “The instantly complained of error involves the recent disclosure that the government’s strike force attorneys involved the trial judge in their investigatory and prosecutorial roles by enlisting his assistance, in the midst of the trial, in surreptitiously sending an informant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. McElhanon v. HingArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. United States v. CerrellaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1982
  4. United States v. FrezzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. United States v. PlatshornDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API