Legal Opinion

Arundel Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 4, 1952No. 46210PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJoNes, Chief Judge

Plaintiff claims damages for alleged excess costs, extra work, and delays under a contract in connection with a flood control project authorized as a public work under the National Industrial Recovery Act.. The entire project covered areas in three counties in the Muskingum river valley in Ohio. It involved the construction of a number of dams, reservoirs, and levees, as well as the relocation of parts of nine different railroad lines and several utility lines.

Contracts for different phases of the extensive project were made with various companies. The relocation of the railroad lines…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. Howard P. Foley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Wm. Eisenberg & Sons, Inc. ex rel. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API