Legal Opinion

Stiebel v. Haigney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1909No. 1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, John J. Haigney, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 9th day of February, 1909, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Hew York Special Term in an action in equity to foreclose a lien upon certain shares of stock.

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, J.:

The complaint alleged that the plaintiffs were stockbrokers and "that on or about the 13th of September, 1906, the defendant Haigney opened an account with them; that thereafter at his request they purchased and 'sold on his account various securities and defendant deposited with them certain shares of stock as margin. On the 31st of December, 1906, an account was stated, showing $2,318.20 due and owing to the plaintiffs, which sum defendant promised and agreed to pay ; that he had refused upon demand; that the plaintiffs have the said stock deposited as margin or security in their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Merritt v. . BissellNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. Harvey v. J. P. Morgan & Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  3. Marion Savings Bank v. LeahySupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Cohen v. RothschildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  5. Curtis v. ThomsonNew York Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API