Legal Opinion

Frost v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1918No. 21,376PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 1; Alston W. Dana, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The sole question for determination is whether the trial court erred in sustaining defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. It is. conceded that the motion is in substance a demurrer to the petition. The action was for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of the city. On plaintiff’s former appeal the action of the trial court in overruling a demurrer to defendant’s answer was affirmed. (Frost v. City of Topeka, 98 Kan. 636, 161 Pac. 936.) The syllabus of that case states the facts and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Butler v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Frost v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rose v. City of GypsumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Kretchmar v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Carder v. City of ClarksburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Gorman v. City of RosedaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Stolp v. City of Arkansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API