Legal Opinion

State v. Fitman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 23, 2012No. A11-406PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOLLY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted after a jury trial of two counts of felony concealing a minor child. She now argues that there was insufficient evidence for a jury to find her guilty of concealing the children and that her convictions must be reversed. Because there is no evidence in the record that appellant concealed the children, we reverse.

FACTS

Appellant Tammy Marie Fitman and M.B. are the parents of two children, born in 1999 and 2002. When the parents divorced in 2005, they were granted joint legal custody, appellant was granted physical custody, and M.B. was granted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Gassler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. C.C. v. G.D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. EDMUND FLEET v. ERICKA FLEET.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. EDMUND FLEET v. ERICKA FLEET.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State of Minnesota v. William Alan FellnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API