Legal Opinion
A123 Systems, Inc. v. Hydro-Quebec
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 10, 2010No. 2010-1059PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
A123 Systems, Inc. (“A123”) appeals from the final decision of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts denying A123’s motion to reopen and dismissing its declaratory judgment action against Hydro-Quebec (“HQ”). A123 Sys., Inc. v. Hydro-Quebec, 657 F.Supp.2d 276 (D.Mass.2009). We affirm.
Background
A123 filed suit in the District of Massachusetts on April 7, 2006, seeking a declaration of noninfringement and invalidity with respect to two patents, U.S. Patents 5,910,382 (“the '382 patent”) and 6,514,640 (“the '640 patent”) (collectively, “the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Lone Star Silicon Innovations v. Nanya Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI CORP.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Alps South, LLC v. Ohio Willow Wood Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- University of Utah v. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Wissenschaften E.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.