Legal Opinion
University of Utah v. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Wissenschaften E.V.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 19, 2013No. 2012-1540, 2012-1541, 2012-1661PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge REYNA.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MOORE.
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
The University of Utah (“UUtah”) brought this lawsuit to correct inventor-ship of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,056,704 and 7,078,196 (the “Tuschl Patents”). Originally, UUtah named as defendants the assignees (“Assignees”) of the Tuschl Patents: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Wissenschaften e.V., Max-Planck-Innovation GmbH, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Massachusetts Insti*1318tute of Technology, and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (collectively, the “non-State…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Secured Mail Solutions LLC v. Universal Wilde, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. True Health Diagnostics LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Lone Star Silicon Innovations v. Nanya Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Gensetix, Inc. v. Baylor College of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Ali v. Carnegie Institution of WashingtonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.